Friday, February 27, 2015
cell phone blog
The founding fathers did not incorporate cell phones into the constitution in 1787 for obvious reasons, they were not invented yet. Though, that is why the supreme court is around today, to make sense of the constitution and see if certain things are constitutional and unconstitutional. The Riley vs. California case caught the attention of the supreme court, they then had to make a decision on whether a warrant was needed to look through an individual's cell phone just as a warrant is needed to look through an individual's home or car. Personally I believe that a warrant should be needed to look through a cell phone because it is personal property. “When the Founding Fathers sat down to write the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in the late 1700s, they made sure that the First Amendment protected the right to free speech… and that the Fourth Amendment protected the right to privacy” (14). The supreme court had the same mindset as me, “The Justices ruled that police need to ask permission or get a warrant from a judge to search inside someone’s home” (14). When a warrant is needed to search a cell phone it takes time, in that time lives could be lost and justice can be brought to criminals. In certain situations like this I believe that it should be alright to look through a cell phone without a warrant in order to save a life of bring a criminal to justice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)